Our submission on the IASB's conceptual framework review (DP/2013/1)
was largely supportive, but we expressed concerns about the section dealing with profit and other comprehensive income (OCI). The section on Profit and OCI reads somewhat as if the drafters have tried to back-fill a conceptual foundation for standards that have already been written by justifying a variety of accounting treatments, whereas in our view a conceptual framework should be a clear, succinct aspirational framework for standard setters to work towards as they prepare a consistent, cohesive suite of standards. It may be that a new standard is not fully in line with the conceptual framework for political or cost/benefit reasons, but the framework should nevertheless be set as a goal or aspiration.
As we say in our detailed views it is vital that the IASB should articulate a conceptual basis for the separate existence of Profit and OCI because OCI has been used in a number of recent standards. If, for example, Profit is intended to reflect only realised items, this needs to be explicitly stated at the conceptual level and the concept of “realised” defined within an accrual accounting framework. This would then enable a conceptual basis to be expressed for recycling. In the absence of a robust definition of Profit, recycling has no place in a conceptual framework.
In summary, our views are that:
Tags:NewsReporting |
Chris and Stephanie act as consultants and experts (“clean” and “dirty” experts) in the context of dispute resolution on a variety of financial reporting and audit issues.
Westworth Kemp Consultants can provide support to businesses, professional practices and regulators seeking to implement systems designed to foster compliance
Independent advice on the interpretation of auditing (or assurance) and accounting (or financial reporting) standards can be hard to find.
© Copyright Westworth Kemp Consultants 2012.
Website design and development by Snap (St Leonards)